<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constructivism in practice &#8211; making lectures work</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.genyes.org/index.php/2009/10/21/constructivism-in-practice-making-lectures-work/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.genyes.org/index.php/2009/10/21/constructivism-in-practice-making-lectures-work/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=constructivism-in-practice-making-lectures-work</link>
	<description>Thoughts About Empowering Students with Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:39:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Bogush</title>
		<link>http://blog.genyes.org/index.php/2009/10/21/constructivism-in-practice-making-lectures-work/comment-page-1/#comment-142201</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Bogush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.genyes.com/?p=1676#comment-142201</guid>
		<description>In a project based class I have had similar experiences.  I have found that the projects that were introduced with the most complete directions loaded up front were not the most successful.  The projects that we jumped into and the students were able to see the end before more precise directions were more successful.  Seems as though one comes across as telling them what to do but &quot;They have no hooks to hang their thoughts on – no context for understanding what the teacher is saying.&quot;  The latter comes across more as coaching as supplementing their plans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a project based class I have had similar experiences.  I have found that the projects that were introduced with the most complete directions loaded up front were not the most successful.  The projects that we jumped into and the students were able to see the end before more precise directions were more successful.  Seems as though one comes across as telling them what to do but &#8220;They have no hooks to hang their thoughts on – no context for understanding what the teacher is saying.&#8221;  The latter comes across more as coaching as supplementing their plans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia Martinez</title>
		<link>http://blog.genyes.org/index.php/2009/10/21/constructivism-in-practice-making-lectures-work/comment-page-1/#comment-142118</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia Martinez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.genyes.com/?p=1676#comment-142118</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say if there&#039;s one general book to read, it would be &quot;The Case for Constructivist Classrooms&quot;
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0871202115/ref=olp_product_details?ie=UTF8&amp;me=&amp;seller=

It pulls together research and practical classroom examples very nicely.

A seminal work and research on educational technology and constructivism:
Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World
http://www.amazon.com/Constructionism-Practice-Designing-Thinking-Learning/dp/0805819851

There is also a deep collection of constructivist books for education here:
http://constructivistconsortium.org/books/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say if there&#8217;s one general book to read, it would be &#8220;The Case for Constructivist Classrooms&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0871202115/ref=olp_product_details?ie=UTF8&#038;me=&#038;seller" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0871202115/ref=olp_product_details?ie=UTF8&#038;me=&#038;seller</a>=</p>
<p>It pulls together research and practical classroom examples very nicely.</p>
<p>A seminal work and research on educational technology and constructivism:<br />
Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World<br />
<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Constructionism-Practice-Designing-Thinking-Learning/dp/0805819851" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/Constructionism-Practice-Designing-Thinking-Learning/dp/0805819851</a></p>
<p>There is also a deep collection of constructivist books for education here:<br />
<a href="http://constructivistconsortium.org/books/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://constructivistconsortium.org/books/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://blog.genyes.org/index.php/2009/10/21/constructivism-in-practice-making-lectures-work/comment-page-1/#comment-142117</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.genyes.com/?p=1676#comment-142117</guid>
		<description>It makes sense to me. Is there any research available to support these ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It makes sense to me. Is there any research available to support these ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Russo</title>
		<link>http://blog.genyes.org/index.php/2009/10/21/constructivism-in-practice-making-lectures-work/comment-page-1/#comment-142113</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Russo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.genyes.com/?p=1676#comment-142113</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post, Sylvia. Our building team leaders are doing a book talk on Marzano&#039;s Art &amp; Science of Teaching, and we just finished a conversation about the chapter on how students acquire knowledge in learning. Pre-learning activities that allow students to &quot;play&quot; with new information as Mesibov discusses are important, and the more interactive, the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post, Sylvia. Our building team leaders are doing a book talk on Marzano&#8217;s Art &amp; Science of Teaching, and we just finished a conversation about the chapter on how students acquire knowledge in learning. Pre-learning activities that allow students to &#8220;play&#8221; with new information as Mesibov discusses are important, and the more interactive, the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

